The way the media
talks about it, you would think that the killers here are some kind of victims
themselves, having had this crime thrust upon their once “promising” lives, and
that they had seemingly no choice in the matter. There was another murder, or
sexual assault case, or something years ago where the media also called the
perpetrators “promising.” I want to say they were football players? Like, the narrative
was that they were good football players, and the crime that they committed put
an end to their “promising” careers. And that they would have done great things
in this world, but for this one little hiccup of, I don’t know, killing or
raping someone. And how if this one thing had just not happened, the
possibilities for them would have been endless. … Sure, the possibilities of
how many other people they may have killed (or raped) had they not been caught
for this one crime would be endless.
I find it disheartening
that since the victims themselves don’t have a voice in these situations, no consideration
or feeling on how promising their lives could have been, is ever uttered. The
victim’s actual life was cut short, rather than the criminals’ careers, and no
one has the decency to call that life “promising”? No one can articulate what a
shame it is that the victim’s purpose or potential impact on the universe is
now a great unknown?
I find that if they
simply removed that one stupid word, “promising,” from the vocabulary when
discussing killers and rapists and other bad people, I would probably not have
an issue with a lot of the news coverage. But the addition of that one
descriptive word makes it sound so victim-blamey to me. Like, if that little
girl had just NOT DIED, these kids could go one with their wonderful, possibly
amazing, and certainly PROMISING lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment